Mark Whitehouse vs Ryotaro Matsumura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Sep at 03:31 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Whitehouse vs R. Matsumura

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Whitehouse 1 - 0 Matsumura
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mark Whitehouse winning 2 and Ryotaro Matsumura winning 0. The last match between Mark Whitehouse and Ryotaro Matsumura was at the M25 Sapporo, 10-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mark Whitehouse getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Whitehouse | 1 |
| Matsumura | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Sapporo(09-10-25)
M. Whitehouse vs R. Matsumura H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.37% (202-199) | Career Total W/L | 60.93% (131-84) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Whitehouse vs R. Matsumura Match Preview:
- Matsumura's recent second serve performance has been slightly better than Whitehouse's, with a win percentage of 45.36% compared to Whitehouse's 43.5%. How important is second serve performance in predicting match outcomes? It seems to have a high correlation.
- When it comes to returning the opponent's second serve, Whitehouse slightly edges out Matsumura with a win rate of 44.44% compared to Matsumura's 42.86%.
- For first-serve returns, Whitehouse again has a small advantage, with 28.64% compared to Matsumura's 27.09%.
- Under pressure, Whitehouse has outperformed Matsumura by saving 57.29% of breakpoints compared to Matsumura's 45.19%.
- In terms of overall match success over the past year, Whitehouse has a slight advantage with a 59.26% win rate, compared to Matsumura's 56.52%.
- Matsumura excels on indoor hard surfaces with a 71% win rate, while Whitehouse performs best on hard courts with a 52% win rate.
- Whitehouse has played against tougher opponents recently, facing players with an average rank of 249.7 versus Matsumura's 296.39.
- Whitehouse is far superior in deciding set scenarios, winning 43% of such situations over the last year, compared to Matsumura's 20%.
- Regarding breakpoint conversion, Whitehouse has a distinct edge with 43.24% compared to Matsumura's 36.54%.
Editorial Prediction (September 10, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the recent performance patterns and strengths of both players, Whitehouse appears to have several advantages. With better breakpoint conversion rates and a more impressive track record under pressure, Whitehouse demonstrates a strong potential to handle crucial match situations effectively.
Whitehouse's better performance in deciding sets also positions them as a formidable competitor if the match becomes tightly contested. Additionally, competing against higher-ranked opponents recently showcases Whitehouse's ability to challenge tougher competition.
While Matsumura shows promise, particularly on indoor hard surfaces, Whitehouse's broader consistency and ability to perform under various circumstances suggest an edge.
Based on these factors, Whitehouse emerges as the likely winner for the upcoming tennis match.
Mark Whitehouse vs Ryotaro Matsumura Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Whitehouse vs R. Matsumura H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:6:36 | Average Match Time | 1:6:36 |
| 56% (24/43) | 1st Serve % | 56% (28/50) |
| 92% (22/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (18/28) |
| 58% (11/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (23/50) | Return Points Win % | 23% (10/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Whitehouse Recent Matches Played
R. Matsumura Recent Matches Played

M. Whitehouse vs R. Matsumura Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.37% (202/199) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.93% (131/84) |
| 50.65% (466/454) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.55% (287/187) |
| 50.60% (4457/4351) | Games Win/Loss | 55.64% (2344/1869) |
| 51.88% (124/115) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.26% (96/66) |
| 46.34% (19/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 63.41% (26/15) |
| 49.44% (44/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 75.00% (9/3) |
| 46.88% (15/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1557 | Aces Total | 257 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 767 | Total Double Faults | 148 |
| 1:9:19 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 215.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 349.98 |
| 65% (13640/21052) | 1st Serve % | 62% (4012/6509) |
| 68% (9333/13640) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2513/4012) |
| 47% (3513/7412) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1245/2497) |
| 41% (814/1984) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (310/741) |
| 39% (8078/20892) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2742/6572) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41.03% (16/23) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 51.67% (186/174) | Futures W/L | 61.32% (130/82) |
| 51% (201/398) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (128/210) |
| 47% (58/123) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (19/36) |
| 48% (58/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (21/49) |
| 81% (210/171) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (130/117) |
| 18% (210/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (130/13) |
| 16% (191/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (85/14) |